Dear Star Tribune editorial folks

When you're in a state with four law schools full of professors who spend their lives studying justice, an active and engaged bar, a judiciary acutely aware of what can happen when judicial elections get out of hand, and a Chief Justice determined to keep an underfunded court system working, why do you feel the need to hand over one side of the judicial retention debate to a man who earns his keep as the CEO of a chain of fast food joints owned by his political sugar daddy?