tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13246828.post963870741547193343..comments2023-10-16T04:31:56.169-05:00Comments on the Cucking Stool: Republicans playing with constitutions IIISpothttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04320639130804814361noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13246828.post-39036106314844814782011-04-22T01:47:59.311-05:002011-04-22T01:47:59.311-05:00The rights have explicit qualifications there in t...The rights have explicit qualifications there in the passages you cite. The contention then is not over anyone’s absolute Constitutional right, but over the limits and conditions under which the right may be exercised.<br /><br />What is conditional is more a privilege than an inalienable right. All you’re standing on is a claim that this is a *really, really important* privilege.foxmarkshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09190671037365370011noreply@blogger.com