Friday, April 03, 2009

Hoisted on one's own petard

There will be a great deal written about the Iowa Supreme Court's unanimous decision today holding that a statute that limits civil marriage to opposite sex couples violates the equal protection provisions of the Iowa Constitution. But in looking over the opinion and the Court's own summary of it, one justification for the decision jumped out at me:
“Our constitution does not permit any branch of government to resolve these types of religious debates and entrusts to courts the task of ensuring government avoids them . . . . The statute at issue in this case does not prescribe a definition of marriage for religious institutions. Instead, the statute, declares, ‘Marriage is a civil contract’ and then regulates that civil contract . . . . Thus, in pursuing our task in this case, we proceed as civil judges, far removed from the theological debate of religious clerics, and focus only on the concept of civil marriage and the state licensing system that identifies a limited class of persons entitled to secular rights and benefits associated with marriage.”

The full opinion (big pdf) recognizes at page 66:
As a result, civil marriage must be judged under our constitutional standards of equal protection and not under religious doctrines or the religious views of individuals. This approach does not disrespect or denigrate the religious views of many Iowans who may strongly believe in marriage a s a dual-gender union, but considers, as we must, only the constitutional rights of all people, as expressed by the promise of equal protection for all. We are not permitted to do less and would damage our constitution immeasurably by trying to do more.

In other words, those seeking to limit marriage because of their own religious views do themselves no favor by continuing to loudly proclaim they know God's will and that their God's will ought to control. By casting the question as one of religious doctrine - not civil institutions - the religious community pushed the Supreme Court into a corner. By relying upon grounds based firmly in their religious views, gay marriage opponents forced the Court to avoid religious justification for the institution of marriage lest they do what would "damage our constitution immeasurably." And when one steps back from religious justification for the limitations on marriage, few arguments remain, especially in light of the equal protection standards in the Iowa Constitution. When one religious sect insists as loudly as American evangelicals do that they call the shots, they do risk forcing a court take an opposite position.

Be careful what you screech for, in other words.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

優良的LED工廠所生產的LED,是世界品質第一的LED
裡面的員工都是穿著制服,裡面的室內設計也很優,初二十六要去香舖買香拜拜,led的網站設計空間設計更優,老板也要結婚了,所以找了婚禮錄影
婚禮顧問內的室內設計創業加盟的那一間好多了,結婚玩要去有名的天堂鳥宜蘭民宿玩,是在宜蘭民宿
沒錢就去汽車借款來玩好了

車燈來看看唷!
情趣用品對一般人來說充滿神秘動人的吸引力,許多人想一窺情趣用品究竟,卻又不敢太過接近,因為這個領域充斥著謠言與標籤、讓許多人深怕一碰及就會讓別人投射以異樣的眼光看待。

如果大家稍微留意一下,不難可以發現一些事,大多人在逛街時對每一間情趣用品用品店的櫥窗都會向內張望後姍姍離去,有一些人卻是假裝目不斜視的走過。畢竟台灣人的觀念並沒有像國外一樣的開放,所以還無法很公開與光明正大的踏進情趣用品去選購一些情趣用品
 
利用網路購物的方式去選購情趣用品是相當方便的一件事情,可以從網頁上獲得商品的詳細介紹而不必害羞的去詢問店員商品的使用方法,並且在商品的介紹上面也不亞於從店員那獲得的資訊,有些甚至還更詳細一些。
 
在台灣有許多情趣用品訂購網站,從以前只有少樣的情趣用品用品到今日數百種的情趣用品看來,這種促進閨房之樂的東西已經漸漸地為人們所接受與喜愛。

但以目前的市場來說,絕大部分的情趣用品網站皆以銷售台灣、大陸製造的情趣用品居多。原因很簡單:成本低廉,卻也因此犧牲了品質和安全性!情趣用品是直接與自己和最親密的另一半的身體接觸,為了節省一點點的金錢而選擇品質粗糙的廉價黑心情趣用品,實為相當不智的選擇。

a片是一種藝術,媽媽說未滿十八不能看a片,看到很多人在做SEO排名沒有一定的規則,seoseo是什麼

我想買一台二手車來開,車行的室內設計很優
我家的室內設計很差,led自行車燈很亮
我家在新竹搬家公司要打哪隻電話才能搬家,室內設計做最好的又是哪家
搞不懂網路行銷是什麼!這麼多人在搞說



因為付不起二胎房貸,所以被迫在台北搬家的十種簡單方法
躲去清境民宿就沒人找的到人,快找搬家公司徹夜搬家,旁邊還有人拿加油棒替我加油XD!把室內設計也通通搬光好了!反正這家的室內設計設計的很棒照明也很優,好了上網找台北搬家公司服務最好,開著車向前去吧車燈來看看唷!