Thursday, October 26, 2006

She collapses exhausted

Katie collapses over her Underwood, arms spread wide over her desk, and mumbling Copy Boy, take my latest column to Tice. It is finished. The copy boy eyes her nervously, noticing that she has three pages for him, rather than the usual two. It is clear that Katie has poured herself out over this one.

Indeed she has. Today we get almost 1150 words on the need for the West to gird its loins against a return of the Caliphate. She doesn't call it the Caliphate, but the meaning is clear enough. After the longest wind-up in Katie-column history, here's the pitch:

MAC officials will hold another meeting today about the airport controversy, and Mohamud [more about him in a moment] says he will try to revive the two-tiered pilot project for taxis. Whatever the meeting's outcome, we now have reason to believe that the issue is only a prologue to a larger drama playing out in Minnesota and the United States.

What Katie is referring to, of course, is the problem that has arisen because some Muslim Somali cab drivers don't want to drive fares who are carrying alcohol, usually from the duty-free shop at the airport. The MAC had adopted a system of identifying the temperance cabs and soon thereafter scrubbed the idea. Katie wrote about it before, and is often the case, Spot commented on the column is a post called A teachable moment. Now according to Katie, the aforementioned Hassan Mohamud is urging the MAC to reconsider the implementation of the program because:

Mohamud adds that Americans need to learn about Islamic law because the Muslim population here is growing. That's why the proposed two-tier system for airport cabdrivers is important, he says. It could become a national model for accommodating Islam in areas ranging from housing to contractual arrangements to the workplace.

Hassan Mohamud is a spokesman for the Minnesota Chapter of the Muslim American Society. Katie explains the role of the Society in this issue:

But many Somali drivers at the airport are refusing to carry passengers with alcohol. When I asked Patrick Hogan, Metropolitan Airports Commission spokesman, for his explanation, he forwarded a fatwa, or religious edict, that the MAC had received. The fatwa proclaims that "Islamic jurisprudence" prohibits taxi drivers from carrying passengers with alcohol, "because it involves cooperating in sin according to the Islam."

The fatwa, dated June 6, 2006, was issued by the "fatwa department" of the Muslim American Society, Minnesota chapter, and signed by society officials.

The society is mediating the conflict between the cab drivers and the MAC. That seems odd, since the society itself clearly has a stake in the controversy's outcome.

It is such a shame that Katie is completely dead to irony. Completely. Dead. What if we were talking about, oh say, prayer in school, stem cell research, or abortion? Oh, those things are entirely different, says Katie. No they're not, replies Spot. You may think they are, Katie, but they all spring from the same place: somebody's understanding of teachings from the "Book."

Katie asserts that the Muslim American Society is really a branch of the radical Muslim Brotherhood, and that some Somalis want no part of it. But she misses the point entirely.

There isn't a nickel's worth of difference between the Muslim American Society's "fatwa department" and that fatuous Brooklyn Park imam Mac Hammond, who takes it upon himself to tell his congregation who to vote for.

In fact, Spotty says that American society is more threatened by Christian Reconstructionists like Katie, James Dobson, Michele Bachmann, and Mac Hammond than it will ever be from the American Muslim Society. Katie, remove the log from your own eye before trying to help your neighbor with the mote in his.

Tag: ,

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

God and Michele talk again

Oh Lord, my Lord!

What is it now Michele?

It's just that we left our last conversation a little, well, unresolved. By the way, you sound kind of masculine today. I like that.

Ah, it's just a little head cold. What do you mean unresolved?

[stammering] I was kind of left up in the air about being forgiven for being so bigoted against gays and lesbians. I know that Jesus loves me and all, but I have felt all shivery and cold since we talked.

Yeah, Jesus loves you, Michele, but personally I think you're kind of a jerk.

Oh dear God!

What?

It was just an exclamation.

Taking my name in vain, eh?

Oh no sir, or ma'am!

Just call me God, okay?

Okay. But God, it says right in the Bible, especially in the Books of Moses, that homosexuality is an abomination. What am I to make of that?

Well, in retrospect, I should have written out what I wanted for laws. That's what I did when I gave Moses the Ten Commandments. Not nearly so much room for ambiguity. All this later stuff was dictated when Moses was older and didn't hear so well. For example, you know the stuff about shellfish? Total misunderstanding. I was talking about macaroni shells. Those things are awful! I love shrimp myself. Especially scampi.

And he wrote in this funny cramped hand. Did you know Moses was a lefty? Damn near impossible to read. Lotta mistakes made over the years.

I can't believe it!

Well believe it Michele. I could tell you stories. Like the time . . . well, never mind. Moses was kind of a prude, too. He slipped in some stuff he never got from me. Most people have been sensible enough to discard most of it. Like the business about stoning girls who aren't virgin brides on their fathers' doorsteps. You can bet if I had given men hymens that rule would never have seen the light of day! Or men having to marry their brothers' widows. Pretty barbaric stuff. And how many guys do you know who get along with the sisters-in-law?

This is really hard for me to accept.

I know, Michele, that why there's a couple of years for you to get your head around some of these things before . . .

Before what, God?

Nothing. Really, nothing.

You're not holding out on me, are you God? What is it? Give me a hint? Will I like it?

Well, probably not.

Oh, please tell me.

Okay. If you insist. I took a lotta money off Lucifer or Beelzebub, or whatever you want to call him, over that Job deal. He wants to go double or nothing on you. And you know, you're just crazy enough to stick it out, so I agreed to the bet. It means you'll lose everything: husband, kids, house, reputation. You don't have any cattle do you? But stick with me, kiddo, and I'll make it worth your while in the end.

You mean I'll be elected to Congress?

Don't be silly.

Tag:

What this blog needs is a global moment.

Heed the wombat!

(stolen from Bob Harris)

Mark Kennedy on the teevee

Mark Kennedy's latest ad, entitled War is Good for You (well, not really, but it might just as well be), is set on the porch of what looks like a house in a Stephen King movie. BOOOOOOOOOOOOO!  One statement in the ad jumped out at Spot:
You can't negotiate with people who want to kill you.
In other words, you have to kill them all. Play whack-a-mole until they're all gone. How long will that take, Mark, especially since we seem to have embarked on a very successful world-wide mole breeding program?

You'll undoubtedly have a lot of time to consider how long it will take from your new perch at that sheltered workshop for Republican politicians, The Center of the American Experiment.


Technorati Tags:

What are sheeple?

Here's the lede in the article Herding the Sheeple, Voting on Justice on the terrific new site, Atlantic Free Press:

“Let’s vote on it.” To most people that sounds like the ideal way to solve any issue. But it can also be one of the most dangerous.

In 1967 the U.S. Supreme Court struck down laws prohibiting interracial marriage. Loving v. Virginia was a landmark civil rights decision. But a 1968 Gallup poll documented that 72 percent of Americans opposed interracial marriage. Had America voted on the issue in 1968, civil rights would undoubtedly have been defeated.

Let the people vote is, of course, Michele Bachmann's siren song on the gay marriage ban amendment.

Tag:

Tripping down memory lane with Geoff

Do you think, boy and girls, that Geoff Michel (R-Cakeville) has always been an opponent of conceal and carry handgun legislation? You would be very wrong. He used to think it was a great idea. Spot tried to lay out the details in a post last year on the blog Retire Geoff Michel.

Spot has somewhere, incidentally, copies of the record of the Senate votes referred to in the earlier post regarding the senator's opposition to an amendment to the conceal and carry legislation that would have banned guns from retail establishments like Southdale or hospitals like Fairview Southdale. Makes you think.

Tag:

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Spooky old Alice



Alice Hausman that is. Well, that isn't entirely fair. Spot thinks he's older than Alice, actually. But the spooky part fits, at least on the issue that Spot is about to describe. ("Spooky old Alice," incidentally, was what George Gobel called his wife on Gobel's teevee show, a part played by Jeff Donnell, who was not a guy in drag.)

Representative Hausman is a supporter of the proposed constitutional admendment to dedicate all motor vehicle sales taxes to transportation and transit. A DFLer, Hausman was on the local show Minnesota Matters on Air America Radio this afternoon to defend the amendment and urge listeners to vote "yes."

Here's the pitch for the amendment: it'll raise $300 million dollars a year for transportation without raising taxes! But Alice, won't that create a hole in the budget of the same size? Not to worry says Alice, the revenue redirection is phased in over five years, and the annual tax revenue growth should cover the difference. It's painless!

If you believe that, boys and girls, you undoubtedly still believe in the Easter Bunny. Revenue growth occurs in part, maybe mostly, because of inflation and population growth. Demand for services like education, health care, public safety, and everything else the state does are going to continue to grow, too. What's that Alice? You forgot about the cost side of the equation? Ooh, too bad.

Speaking of health care, the Minnesota Care program, with the 1% health care provider tax, consistently runs surpluses. The governor and the legislature don't seem to have any trouble taking millions from Minnesota Care surpluses and putting them in the general fund.

Why, Alice, are cars (and to be fair, transit) more important than healthy citizens, especially children?

The best thing to be said about this proposal by the legislature to the citizens of Minnesota is that it is an act of legislative cowardice, a bob and weave to avoid making hard funding decisions, or revenue decisions for that matter.

What if you don't hit the numbers, Alice? Too bad, so sad, education takes a hit! If this is such a great idea, why don't we dedicate liquor sales taxes to addiction programs, or the sales taxes on books to adult literacy programs? Or maybe, we could even, like, put the money from the "health impact fee" into the paying the health care costs of smoking! What a concept! The possibilities are endless.

Spot wrote about this issue once before, about how everybody wants their own mason jar with money in it that they don't have to subject to the political process, in a post titled Cornholing the future.

Spot says just vote NO.

Update: If you really want money from transportation to go into transportation, raise the gas tax.

He's made a little list

Boys and girls, here are some links to articles about some of the great Republican candidates running this fall. You can see that Gil Gutknect and Michele Bachmann made the list compiled by MyDD. Congratulations all!

--AZ-Sen: Jon Kyl

--AZ-01: Rick Renzi

--AZ-05: J.D. Hayworth

--CA-04: John Doolittle

--CA-11: Richard Pombo

--CA-50: Brian Bilbray

--CO-04: Marilyn Musgrave

--CO-05: Doug Lamborn

--CO-07: Rick O'Donnell

--CT-04: Christopher Shays

--FL-13: Vernon Buchanan

--FL-16: Joe Negron

--FL-22: Clay Shaw

--ID-01: Bill Sali

--IL-06: Peter Roskam

--IL-10: Mark Kirk

--IL-14: Dennis Hastert

--IN-02: Chris Chocola

--IN-08: John Hostettler

--IA-01: Mike Whalen

--KS-02: Jim Ryun

--KY-03: Anne Northup

--KY-04: Geoff Davis

--MD-Sen: Michael Steele

--MN-01: Gil Gutknecht

--MN-06: Michele Bachmann

--MO-Sen: Jim Talent

--MT-Sen: Conrad Burns

--NV-03: Jon Porter

--NH-02: Charlie Bass

--NJ-07: Mike Ferguson

--NM-01: Heather Wilson

--NY-03: Peter King

--NY-20: John Sweeney

--NY-26: Tom Reynolds

--NY-29: Randy Kuhl

--NC-08: Robin Hayes

--NC-11: Charles Taylor

--OH-01: Steve Chabot

--OH-02: Jean Schmidt

--OH-15: Deborah Pryce

--OH-18: Joy Padgett

--PA-04: Melissa Hart

--PA-07: Curt Weldon

--PA-08: Mike Fitzpatrick

--PA-10: Don Sherwood

--RI-Sen: Lincoln Chafee

--TN-Sen: Bob Corker

--VA-Sen: George Allen

--VA-10: Frank Wolf

--WA-Sen: Mike McGavick

--WA-08: Dave Reichert

God, that's Freudian

From Power Line yesterday:

If you missed it over the weekend, check out our podcast
of the interview we did with Tony Show on our radio show on Saturday.
It's a fun conversation, with Tony's candid comments on the White House
Press Corps, President Bush, and more.

Posted by John at 09:11 AM

Monday, October 23, 2006

Come to Jesus, er, Julie




This one is for Spot's homies, the DFLers in Senate District 41. Spot has received reports that people want to vote for Andrew Borene, even though he has withdrawn. Spot says just don't do it. It isn't good for Andrew, the DFL, or Senate District 41.

When Andrew Borene withdrew from the race, Spot originally wanted the DFL to endorse another DFLer to run a write-in campaign. That did not happen.

There is one progressive left in this race: Julie Risser. Vote for her. Put her lawn signs up. Work for her. Retire Geoff Michel.

Oh, and one more thing. If you're a DFLer, leave a comment saying that you support Julie.


Technorati Tags: ,

God: listen up Michele!



Michele? Michele, are you listening?

[trembling] Who's that?

It's me, God.

Really? You sound so, so . . . feminine.

I didn't make up all that white beard crap, you people did.

What is it you want me to do, sir, I mean ma'am, I mean God?

Well, you can start by ditching the delusion that I give a rat's arse whether you get elected to Congress.

But ma'am, I . . .

Oh, and another thing: quit putting words in my mouth. Who the hell do you think you are, me?

Ma'am, but the Bible says we are made in Your Image.

Yeah, and you've done it exactly backwards. You're trying to make me in your own bigoted image. And it's starting to really annoy me. I don't know who's worse, you or that putz Mac Hammond. Winner's way, greed it good, what an arsehole.

I must say ma'am, you are a lot saltier than I expected.

SILENCE! You've heard of the plagues against Egypt? You think I'm salty now, just keep it up and see what happens when I really get mad.

Lord, Lord cast me not away in disfavor!

Ok, here's what I want you to do Michele. Remember that all of God's people and creatures have a place in the choir. Not just you.

I will Lord.

No you won't. I'm omniscient, remember?

Then do you forgive me?


We'll talk about that later.


Artwork by Ken Avidor


Technorati Tags:

Don't bother to impeach

Last night in a 60 Minutes interview, Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca) said that she wouldn't push an agenda seeking impeachment of President Bush if she was elected Speaker of the House. Good for her.

There will be plenty of time for that kind of stuff once the War Crimes Tribunal for the Former Iraq is empaneled.

Sunday, October 22, 2006

Vote for Julie

Spot asked Julie Risser for the party she would caucus with if elected Senator in Senate District 41. In a comment to that post, Julie said she would caucus with the DFL.

You know, boys and girls, that Spot has been supporting Andrew Borene for the seat. Regrettably, Andrew withdrew. What to do?

Vote for Geoff Michel? Don't be ridiculous. He still need retiring.

Vote for Andrew Borene, who will still be on the ballot? A sentimental choice, but useless in advancing the ball for progressives in 41.

Or, boys and girls, you can do what Spot is going to do. Vote for Julie Risser.

Spot has been critical of Julie, but Spot's a big dog, at least big enough to admit circumstances have changed and that he's changed his mind.

Julie is so much better than Michel on many issues. She has the endorsement of, among others, the Sierra Club and Outfront Minnesota. In the days before the election, Spot hopes to review Michel's record and why Julie deserves to beat him.

In the meantime, let Spot just say that he recommends Julie for the Senate seat in District 41 and hopes you will vote for her.

A question for Julie

Julie Risser, that is.

If you won the SD41 Senate seat, with whom would you caucus?

The comment line is open.

Saturday, October 21, 2006

Hey Spotty! You’re wrong!

Is that you Dave? Or Peter? Maybe Sticks? Oh, it's you grasshopper. You say that Spot is in error? Unlikely, but Spotty will hear you out.

Spotty, you remember when you said that the Military Commissions Act did not apply to citizens?

Yes, that was Spot's impression based on his reading of the MCA at the time it was enacted. That's the view of the New York Times as expressed in a recent editorial, too.

I know, Spotty, but what about this language in the part of the MCA that outlines the substantive violations of the MCA?

Any person subject to this chapter who, in breach of an allegiance or duty to the United States, knowingly and intentionally aids an enemy of the United States ... shall be punished as a military commission … may direct.

You raise a very important and interesting point, grasshopper. Who owes "allegiance or duty to the United States?" That does sound a lot like citizens. On the other hand, the military commissions act was specifically enacted to deal with unlawful combatants; these are the persons "subject to this chapter."

But Spotty will concede there's an ambiguity. And it's probably a big enough ambiguity to get citizens thrown into the gulag from which they will have no judicial remedy until they have been tried and convicted by a military commission.

Boys and girls for further reading on the subject, Spot recommends this article.

Update: And this one, too, by Peter Van Erp on Informed Comment.

Tags: ,

Friday, October 20, 2006

Moderates don't torture, Jimbo

Jimbo, meet the Iraqi detainee nick-named Gilligan.



This is a picture of Gilligan under the care and custody of the US military at Abu Ghraib.

Jimbo, what are Gilligan's remedies for any torture, mistreatment or humiliation he received? What's that, Jimbo? Spot can't hear you.

Ok, if you won't say, Spot will. Gilligan has no remedies of course to get himself out detention if he is innocent, ameriolate his treatment, or recover damages from his tormenters.

Why is that? Well the answers are contained in the Military Commissions Act that Jimbo the Moderate supported.


Technorati Tags:

Will the last judge

Will the last judge to leave the courthouse please turn off the lights? You might as well leave the door unlocked, however, as it is apparent that the Republicans are not done looting the judiciary.

When Spot fired up his computer this morning, there was a message from CP mentioning to Spot this article in the Friday Washington Post. The Post gave it a prominent spot –page A18 – a curious place to announce the latest episode in America's continuing constitutional crisis and slide into fascism. Here's the headline and lede:

Court Told It Lacks Power in Detainee Cases

By Karen DeYoung

Moving quickly to implement the bill signed by President Bush this week that authorizes military trials of enemy combatants, the administration has formally notified the U.S. District Court here that it no longer has jurisdiction to consider hundreds of habeas corpus petitions filed by inmates at the Guantanamo Bay prison in Cuba.

You might notice, boys and girls, that the administration "formally notified" the court that it no longer had jurisdiction to consider the habeas corpus petitions. Not the administration filed motions to dismiss these habeas corpus petitions. Just told the court to buzz off. This action was taken as a result of the recently passed – and now signed into law – Military Commission Act. Among other thing, most of which Spot has already discussed, it eliminated the habeas corpus rights for detainees in the warron terra.

Mr. Marbury, meet Mr. Madison.

But Spotty, what if the administration locks up somebody who isn't even covered by the Military Commissions Act? Will the government just "notify" the court it doesn't have the jurisdiction to ever hear the case to determine whether the Military Commissions Act applies?

That's an excellent question, grasshopper. The government apparently believes it does not even have to come into court and show that the MCA applies. Just a little post card to the judge, sort of like the post cards you get, boys and girls, telling you that you may have won 23 million dollars in the Publisher's Clearing House sweepstakes. If that position prevails, anybody could be designated "hands off" by the administration. If that doesn't scare the everloving bejeesus out of you, boys and girls, it should.

In every case commenced in court, the court must determine as a preliminary matter whether it has the jurisdiction to hear the case. That decision, like all trial court decisions, is reviewable on appeal. But the trial court makes it in the first instance, not one of the litigants. Imagine boys and girls, if you were swindled out of a sum of money, and that when you sued to recover the money, the defendant could just write a letter to the judge saying, well, I don't live in the jurisdiction. You must dismiss. And the judge did dismiss, without even having a hearing and accepting proof on the residence of the defendant?

Another thing the administration is trying to do is keep these petitioners from presenting arguments that extinguishment of the writ of habeas corpus is unconstitutional under the Suspension Clause to the Constitution.

There is one lawyer in the Republican congressional delegation from Minnesota. That's Jim Ramstad. How did he vote on the Military Commissions Act? Well, for it of course. The others voted for it, too, but Jimbo's vote was especially odious and an affront to the rule of law. Shame on you Jimbo!

Tags: ,

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Suggested reading for Jimbo

According to an interview yesterday on Air American Minnesota with Besty O'Berry, Wendy Wilde's campaign manager, Jim Ramstad went ballistic at a candidate forum at Wayzata High School this week when another candidate (Spot's money is on Michael Cavlan, the Green party candidate for US Senate) suggested that the Republicans had, er, fibbed us into war. (Do you remember how to diagram sentences, boys and girls? Give that one a try.)

Jimbo called that slander of "good people." Well, Jimbo, you surly know that truth is a defense to a defamation action. We have plenty of truth and proof of it here.

Spot recommends you go to www.buzzflash.com/bushlied/ for a compendium of sources, lists, articles and charts on the lies of the president and his confidence men and women that got us into Iraq. Screaming and yelling won't change those facts. Jimbo, your party, with your help, has visited the most misery on the country and the world in a generation. Congratulations.

Update: For those of you more visually inclined, here's a timeline of lies by Bushco at Mother Jones. Spotty recommended.

Tag:

Jimbo's membership

In the Party of Michele Bachmann, that is. Spot told you yesterday about Jim Ramstad's support of a bill that promotes the blurring of the line between church and state, and the fundraiser he helped sponsor for the woman who wants to destroy it all together. For the few of you who haven't already seen it, here's Michele Bachmann's appearance at Mac Hammond's (the Winner's Way) church where she declared she was called by God to run for Congress, and that she was a fool for Christ.

Either Jimbo doesn't know, or doesn't care, that nutjobs like Michele Bachmann want to obliterate one of our principal freedoms: the freedom to be unencumbered by religion that has the imprimatur of government.


Technorati Tags: ,

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Why, oh why, Jimbo?

Why, oh why, Jimbo, did you co-sponsor a bill to help turn this country into a theocracy?

That's what Jim Ramstad did, boys and girls. Don't believe Spotty? Here's the bill. Here's the description of what it is supposed to do:

To amend the Revised Statutes of the United States to eliminate the chilling effect on the constitutionally protected expression of religion by State and local officials and the Federal Government that results from the threat that potential litigants may seek damages and attorney's fees. [italics are Spot's]

But Spotty, aren't government officials supposed to refrain from religious expression when they're acting as, like, public officials, anyway? That's what the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment is all about!

Grasshopper, you are a precocious fellow! Certainly more precocious than Jimbo. Anyway, the title of the bill is the "Veterans' Memorials, Boy Scouts, Public Seals, and Other Public Expressions of Religion Protection Act of 2006."

Here are the things that the bill "protects:"

The remedies with respect to a claim under this section are limited to injunctive and declaratory relief where the deprivation consists of a violation of a prohibition in the Constitution against the establishment of religion, including, but not limited to, a violation resulting from—

"(1) a veterans' memorial's containing religious words or imagery;

"(2) a public building's containing religious words or imagery;

"(3) the presence of religious words or imagery in the official seals of the several States and the political subdivisions thereof; or

"(4) the chartering of Boy Scout units by components of States and political subdivisions, and the Boy Scouts' using public buildings of States and political subdivisions.".
The principal purpose of this bill is to defund public interest litigation in Establishment Clause cases. It deprives litigants of any claim for damages and, in another section, any claim for attorneys' fees, which are usually awarded in a successful civil rights actions under 42 USC § 1983.

But Spotty, the enumerated things don't look so bad.

Grasshopper, it is the "but not limited to" language and the "public building's [sic] containing religious words or imagery" that are especially troublesome. The way Spot reads this, literally anything done by a federal, state or local official in the name of religion would be insulated against damages. The enumerated items are all written, but the "not limited to" language would insulate from damages all kinds of prayers, incantations, sermonizing, proselytizing, and religious demagoguery.

And the language about "religious words or imagery" referring to public buildings means not only In God We Trust over the front door, but get ready to stumble over baby Jesus in the manger in city halls all over America.

Jimbo's name is on this stinker as a sponsor with such Congressional luminaries as Marilyn Musgrave, Tom Tancredo, and Jean Schmidt. Oh by the way, John Kline and Mark Kennedy were also sponsors. Perhaps Gil wasn't there they day the passed the pad around! (Spot believes he did vote for the bill, though.)

These guys would be so happy to have Michele Bachmann join the cause that they sponsored a fund raiser in Washington for her on July 20th of this year. She would be a reliable vote for garbage like this.

This bill was passed in the House on September 14th of this year and has not been acted on by the Senate. Spotty says you might think, boys and girls, about sending a little money to Democrats in close Senate races.

Tag: